Search This Blog

Showing posts with label #hormone disruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #hormone disruption. Show all posts

Thursday, January 14, 2016

5 Reasons Phthalates Should Be Banned Immediately

5 Reasons Phthalates Should Be Banned Immediately

Not that long ago, I talked about 12 ways toxins are sneaking into your life http://dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31911, and while all toxins are bad news, there’s one group that should be banned immediately. I’m talking about phthalates; these are a class of chemicals used to make plastic flexible. For that reason, they’re also commonly referred to as plasticizers. Because they affect reproductive system development http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=32639, the US government made the smart decision to keep them out of children’s products, banning six of them. This seems like a good thing, right? Well, it’s a start. The problem is there are a lot more than six types, and there’s nothing stopping manufacturers from using unbanned ones. That ban also only deals with kids’ products, so where does that leave the rest of us? Well, if you’re still wondering why phthalates are so bad, here are five reasons they should be banned this instant.

Image

1. Phthalates Have Infiltrated Children’s Food

I mentioned my “12 Toxins” post earlier, and this topic came up there, but I want to talk a little more about it. There’s a fairly mysterious thing happening right now: phthalates are getting into some infant diets and at very high levels. Now logically, you’d think if phthalates are taken out of kids’ products—and, for the most part, they are, since the ban covers the six most commonly used ones—there’d be no room for exposure. But, that’s not the case. The contamination is believed to happen somewhere in food processing, or—since phthalates bind to fat molecules—the chemicals might even be in the animal feed and move on from there. Basically, the food is exposed to phthalates before it gets to the table.


2. Phthalates Make Plastic Medical Devices Unsafe

While phthalates might be well regulated in toys, that’s not the case when it comes to medical supplies. These plasticizers are still used heavily in plastic medical devices — the same devices used to keep preemies alive! Most hospitals and clinics don’t regulate how these chemicals are used, so the most vulnerable of infants could be struggling to breathe on a ventilator with plastic tubing. That breathing tube likely contains phthalates that can make their way into the infant’s system. A recent study even found that, over time, preemies are exposed to toxic levels that can affect not only reproductive development but also liver function http://dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=32521. [1]

3. Phthalates are Destroying Our Ecosystems

Here’s another problem — phthalates are contaminating our waterways. Plastic litters our oceans and traditional water bottles are a large culprit. Given that, it makes sense that phthalates will make it into the water supply as those items decompose. Two things can happen: marine life can eat the plastic directly, or just be exposed to phthalates in the water. While it’s still unknown what this toxic marine life means for us, if phthalates are getting into infant diets somehow, could this be a culprit?

4. Phthalates Destroy Hormone Balance

It’s thought that phthalates can disrupt levels of hormones like estrogen and testosterone. I already mentioned that phthalates can affect reproductive health, but there is also a risk for cancer. Don’t think you’re unaffected, either, do you wear makeup or use a moisturizer? Phthalates are often used to help dissolve ingredients. Do you use hairspray? Manufacturers use plasticizers to keep your hair from becoming too stiff. Studies have even found that your exposure to toxic phthalates is higher based on what personal care products you use. [2] [3]

5. Phthalates are Linked to Asthma

Even more worrying is the possible link to childhood asthma. From 1998 to 2006, scientists studied the phthalate levels in over 300 pregnant women. Research found that the children of the women with higher phthalate levels were 72 to 78 percent more likely to have a diagnosis of asthma http://www.dreddyclinic.com/findinformation/aa/asthma.phpthan those of the women with low levels; that number is over three times the national average! [4]

So, are you convinced that phthalates should be banned immediately? Maybe there’s something you know about phthalates that’s not listed here. By all means, leave a comment below and tell us what you think of these nasty toxins.

-Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, ND, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM

References:

1. Mallow, E.B. & Fox, M.A. Phthalates and critically ill neonates: device-related exposures and non-endocrine toxic risks https://noharm-global.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/2991/Phthalates%20and%20Neonates%20-%20Mallow%20%20Fox%20-%20%20J%20%20Perinatology%20Dec%20%202014.pdf. Journal of Perinatology 34, 892-897.

2. Braun, J., Just, A, Williams, P, Smith, K., Calafat, A. & Hauser R. Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic http://www.nature.com/articles/jes201369.epdf?referrer_access_token=IwX44LYZVSbpVczYXOvhgdRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0P9jQ-p7mDj7PSM-5DhiEIx6PPO1DDmApE88KGEmXsaMhnO2VoQJi3cKeVBjG-Ie6J8Go7fmDConNw4f5Fdqdu1. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 24, 459-466.

3. Dodson, R. E., Nishioka, M., Standley, L. J., Perovich, L. J., Brody, J. G., & Rudel, R. A. Endocrine Disruptors and Asthma-Associated Chemicals in Consumer Productshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404651/. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7), 935–943.

4. Whyatt, R. et al. Asthma in Inner-City Children at 5–11 Years of Age and Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates: The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health Cohorthttp://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/122/10/ehp.1307670.alt.pdf. Environmental Health Perspectives, DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307670.



Read more

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Monsanto's Roundup herbicide disrupts hormones

Monsanto's Roundup herbicide disrupts hormones 

Scientists out of Europe have conducted a thorough review of the safety profile of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, determining that the chemical disrupts human hormones at levels well below what the government considers "safe" for weed-control and agricultural desiccation purposes.

Glyphosate http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=117&t=33544-based herbicides (GlyBH), they found, are erroneously regarded as a non-issue by many government bodies who have established safety regulations based solely on industry-backed studies, nearly all of which are favorable towards glyphosate. Meanwhile, independent reviews such as those considered by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which found that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic" to humans, are being ignored.

Hailing from the University of Caen in France, the research team looked at a cohort of scientific studies on glyphosate's toxicity. They evaluated the chemical's teratogenicity (potential to cause birth defects), tumorigenicity (potential to cause tumors), hepatotoxicity (potential to cause liver damage), carcinogenicity (potential to cause cancer) and more, as demonstrated amongst the whole of scientific research into glyphosate.

Perhaps most shockingly, they discovered that glyphosate is immensely toxic at levels well within established safety ranges, which is deeply concerning in light of independent tests showing glyphosate residues in food, drinking water, and even rain water http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/glyphosate-as-safe-as-well-poison/.

This is particularly concerning when it comes to the endocrine system, which is what regulates human hormone production. Dr. Robin Mesnage and her team discovered that even low-dose exposure to glyphosate can trigger severe endocrine damage. Endocrine disruption can lead to a host of other health problems including cancer.

"We reveal a coherent body of evidence indicating that GlyBH could be toxic below the regulatory lowest observed adverse effect level for chronic toxic effects. It includes teratogenic, tumorigenic and hepatorenal effects," the team wrote.

"They could be explained by endocrine disruption and oxidative stress, causing metabolic alterations, depending on dose and exposure time. Some effects were detected in the range of the recommended acceptable daily intake."

Neither glyphosate nor the complete Roundup formula have ever been safety tested over an entire lifespan

Believe it or not, the U.S. Congress actually ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conduct an investigation into endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) like glyphosate nearly 20 years ago. However, to this day, the EPA has yet to follow through with this legal mandate, instead allowing glyphosate use to increase.

Regulatory authorities in the European Union have similarly betrayed their constituents, failing to take seriously the threat of EDCs. Former EU chief scientific advisor Anne Glover reportedly helped delay legislation that would have reined in the use of EDCs, which continue to wreak havoc on public health.

It isn't just glyphosate that poses a problem. The Roundup formula contains a number of other pesticides that the University of Caen paper, which was published in the Elsevier journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, refers to as "adjuvants" that actually amplify the harm caused by exposure to glyphosate.

Large-scale, long-term safety studies on the complete Roundup formula have never been conducted. Even the effects of exposure to glyphosate by itself have never been tested over the entire lifespan of either animals or humans. Just like with genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), industry studies on glyphosate focus solely on young animals exposed to the chemical for a very short period of time, after which these animals are terminated early in order to hide the long-term effects of glyphosate exposure.

"Toxic effects of commercial formulations can also be explained by GlyBH adjuvants, which have their own toxicity, but also enhance glyphosate toxicity," the paper explains. "These challenge the assumption of safety of GlyBH at the levels at which they contaminate food and the environment, albeit these levels may fall below regulatory thresholds."

Sources for this article include:

http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/16349-glyphosate-herbicides-are-toxic-below-regulatory-safety-limits

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869151530034X

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/glyphosate-as-safe-as-well-poison/


Read more